This book deals with one point of Christology alone, and that the manner of the Incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ. It represents an attempt to discover the exact content of the Subject, or Ego, of the manhood of our Lord. It does not in any way deal with the doctrine of the Incarnation as a whole, nor is it in any sense a text-book.
I beg that my readers will persevere in seeking the meaning of what I have written, in spite of the many blemishes that mar my work. This is my first attempt at serious authorship, and it has been made in the middle of my work as a missionary priest, in a country where books are few and which is far away from all centres of Theological thought.
It has grown in interest as our reverence for manhood has deepened. Yet so academic was it at first and for so long a time that it is still held to be a subordinate question of the Faith. So long as men hold fast the fact of the Incarnation, is not the manner of it merely a question for the Schools?
In this case one of the things which have helped to open our eyes is the higher criticism of the Bible. The claim that Christ's knowledge of the Old Testament is not essentially different from that of a Jewish Rabbi has made us realize the problem of the manner of His incarnate life. Is it possible for a Christian to worship Christ as God, to defer to Him as unerring in His teaching about God, and yet to class His statements about the Old Testament with the uncritical views of a Gamaliel? Such a question is widely asked. Even more widely than it is asked verbally, the lack of a satisfying answer is sorely felt.
Kenosis is a Greek substantive denoting an emptying. It has passed into theology from St. Paul's statement that our Lord "emptied Himself" of some thing belonging to the divine state in taking upon Himself our manhood. Generally in Christology, Kenosis denotes that action by which the divine Son modified the exercise of His divine powers so as to allow to the full the free action of the powers proper to His manhood.
It may be used of any such modification, from a mere self-restraint in the use of His powers to a voluntary self-abandonment of the attributes that lie behind those powers in action. It may be so used, wide as the difference is between the two extremes of thought, inasmuch as each writer claims St. Paul as a witness to his theory, quoting him as an apostolic authority for the Kenosis in whatever degree it is postulated.
Weston proposes that the subject of Christ's humanity is the self-limited Logos. Unlike earlier theories that suggested a divestment of divine attributes, Weston argues for a voluntary restraint of divine powers, compatible with genuine human experience yet preserving the fullness of Christ's divinity.
Weston maintains that the incarnate Christ retains all divine attributes, but their expression is now mediated through his assumed human nature. This allows him to affirm both Christ's divine omniscience and the biblical accounts of his human limitations. Weston insists on the permanence of Christ's humanity, even in his exalted state. This offers a compelling vision of the enduring union between God and humanity and provides a robust foundation for understanding Christ's continuing mediatorial role.